Defendants JoEllen Shannon and Rosemary Foster are the
agents for each other (Verified complaint and exhibits) for the
breach
of contract therefore plaintiffs are entitled to compensatory
damages and consequential, foreseeable and incidental damages.
As of this date, defendants has used plaintiffs’ client list and have converted 6 clients and continue to mine the client list with confidential client information to convert additional clients. Each Social Security client is worth $6,000. (Exhibit 1, Social Security regulation.) Defendants have stolen plaintiffs’ client files and therefore the original attorney fee contract cannot be produced for the court. (Exhibit 2) As defendants stole 10 clients at a rate of $6,000 each, therefore, defendants to this date have damaged plaintiffs at $60,000.
Defendant Foster was employed to become the “holding attorney” for retiring attorney, Plaintiff Daniel A. Bernath pursuant to an agreement between the Social Security Administration and Bernath (Exhibit 3). Plaintiff Martha is set to take the SSA test to become an advocate before SSA and the clientele would then be put into ’s name as per the agreement with SSA. Based on the representations with Foster an agreement was entered into and all clients were placed into the name of Rosemary Foster (Exhibit 4). Additional staff was hired, postage purchased, envelopes and stationary purchased, staff used to mail to clients for their signatures, open the mail, process the mail and file with the Social Security offices. This cost was $10,745 Exhibit 5).
Thereafter, Foster renounced her agreement with plaintiffs, began to call all clients and state, without spending the 7 years and $750,000 to build the law practice, that each of plaintiffs’ 3600 clients were actually HER clients now. An additional $10,750 was spent to put the claimants into another holding attorney’s name.
A complaint
was made to the Oregon Bar for Foster’s soliciting of clients right
in the office of Social Security Court, using a “runner” and
“capper” to contact plaintiffs’ clients directly to sign up with the
“new outfit.”
When a request for a response from Foster was requested, Foster
RESIGNED from the Oregon Bar! (Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 7) As such,
it is an admission by conduct that all of the allegations within the
complaint are true and as she knows she will be disbarred or suffer
a great lose ethically (as Judge Letourneau warned her at the TRO
hearing on June 10, 2011[1])
she merely took away the
Oregon Bar’s
power to protect the citizens of Oregon from her lawyer soliciting,
capping and running. Incidentally, after taking plaintiffs’ client
list, Foster and Shannon contacted clients and lied and terrified
plaintiffs’ clients by stating:
“if you go with Foster
and Shannon then you’ll get a hearing sooner on your disability
case.
If you stick with Bernath and , your case will start all over
again at the ‘back of the line.’ adding another two years to your
wait for a hearing.”(exhibit
8)[2]
[1] Defendants show contempt for the Court of Oregon’s power to protect its citizens as well. Even though personally served with summons and complaint and Notice of TRO hearing, she merely blew it off and Judge Letourneau had to telephone her and apparently w
ake her up to answer her phone.
[2] Charles Q, Esq. Washington Bar was hired to take over all of plaintiffs’ cases until became certified. (plaintiffs’ client Douglas Dermain) stole by Foster and Shannon by stating “He was very worried because he said that JoEllen (Shannon, non-attorney capper and runner for Rosemary Foster) told him if he (stayed with the Bernath law firm papers, client) WOULD HAVE TO START OVER FROM SCRATCH.”