The Four medical
professionals blackballed by ALJ Dan R. Hyatt
because they "might" find a claimant disabled.
After Ph.D. Burns was told that he had been "blackballed" by Hyatt because he
"finds claimants disabled", Dr. Burns wrote this letter to point out that on
average he finds more claimants NOT DISABLED than disabled.
Apparently, Dan Hyatt wants a
consultative examiner to ONLY find that claimants are not disabled.
Dan R. Hyatt blackballs psychologists who might find a claimant disabled from
doing an examination for Social Security. click
here
Read Dr. Burn's defense of his profession and himself, BELOW.
|
Caleb Burns, Ph.D Psychologist, Portland-Gresham, 1987 to present. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.A., Claremont Men's College, 1972; Ph.D. in Psychology, University of Hawaii, 1984
BLACKBALLED BY |
Leslie
Pitchford, Ph.D
BLACKBALLED BY |
A Longview-Kelso native, Dr. Meharg completed his doctorate in clinical psychology from Fuller Graduate School of Psychology in 1990. After a final year of training in medical psychology at the Portland VA Medical Center, Dr. Meharg joined Dr. deVidal in private practice. Dr. Meharg has varied interests. In addition to a general practice in child and adult psychotherapy, he holds specialty practices in the evaluation and treatment of ADHD, child behavior disorders, parent training, clinical neuropsychology, and behavior therapy of anxiety disorders. He consults extensively with area medical providers. Dr. Meharg has also served as adjunct faculty at George Fox College and Lower Columbia College, and is a consulting psychologist at St John Medical Center and is board certified by the American College of Forensic Examiners.
BLACKBALLED BY |
has many years of experience helping individuals who are
facing challenges in their lives due to medical problems.
BLACKBALLED BY |
actual Order from ALJ Dan R. Hyatt blackballing
This standard order from ALJ Dan R. Hyatt was received by Oregon State Bar Reporter anonymously but it comports with the several identical orders that a reporter for Oregon State Bar Reporter has seen and handled.
Other
Caleb
Burns statement after learning that he was being blackballed by ALJ Dan R. Hyatt
OCCUPATION: Clinical Psychologist
OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Psychologist, Portland-Gresham, 1987 to present.
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: B.A., Claremont Men's College, 1972; Ph.D. in Psychology, University of Hawaii, 1984.
Dear Attorney Daniel A. Bernath:
I have been told by a variety of
agency representatives that they prefer
my reports to others, and WOU has said my reports are unsurpassed in terms of
background information, activities of daily living, and other important factors
they consider. WOU has also said that my report information helps with setting
the record for Social Security considerations and they have encouraged me to
continue to be complete in my reports.
I sent out feedback letters fairly often to referral sources to ask how my reports meet their needs and the comments have been uniformly positive.
My reports are considerably longer than the average report but I endeavor to include all important relevant information. As an ethical psychologist, I can do no less. For example, if I am asked to comment on the cognitive functioning on an individual, then unless I have performed at least some simple screening (perhaps the Reading subtest of the WRAT-3, or several subtests of the WAIS-III) I will not conclude that the person is presenting without cognitive impairment. To do so would be to reach a conclusion not based on data and that certainly could result in mistreatment of the claimant. (It is often the case that impaired people present superficially as very intact. Similarly, people who may present as impaired are oftentimes quite high-functioning.)
Though continued education, reading, and ongoing consultation with others, I keep current on the important matters related to my specialty. (For example, last Friday I attended a seminar on diagnosing via the DSM-IV-TR and on Saturday I attended a conference on brain injury hosted by the Brain Injury Association of Oregon.)
I noted to you that I had performed previously an examination of a number of claimants to determine how many of them I had found disabled.
As a result of a phone inquiry, on May 25, 1999, I examined on my computer all of the reports that I had written since January 1999 in which my views regarding disability from work was asked of me. As of May 25, there were 147 reports, these performed for Disability Services of Oregon, AFS. Of those, 68 led me to state that the claimant was disabled for 12 months because of psychological problems and 79 were found by me to be not disabled from a psychological perspective,.
Therefore, the total rate at which I found people to be disabled from this population for that five month period was 46 percent or less than half.
Further, I examined the rate at which I found people to have a GAF scale of 49 or lower and a review of my reports over the five months ending May 25, 1999 showed that I have found 68 people to have GAF's 49 or lower and 76 to have GAF's above 49. (I was unable to estimate GAF's on several claimants.) Therefore, 53 percent of the claimants for whom I could determine a GAF had GAFs of 50 or higher. This is more than half of those who were sent to me for an evaluation.
So in general summary, more than half of those evaluated by me that five month period (and I have reason to think that that five month period was nonrepresentative of my usual evaluation outcomes) were not found to be disabled by me, and more than half of that group of claimants had GAF scores of 50 or higher.
I certainly subscribe to the ethical guidelines of my profession and am motivate to do the very best that I can in terms of providing accurate an complete evaluations of those clients sent to me. I very often seek corollary information from family members and others, seek the input of physicians and others, etc. Further, I often make home visits or see claimants in a wide variety of locates outside my office.
I close each report with the following general words: "Thank you for this very interesting evaluation. If you have any questions or comments (or if you have any information which may cause me to modify my diagnoses of this client), please do not hesitate to contact me." I mean that paragraph fully and am please3d when people do contact me with additional information, some of which certainly can change my diagnostic impressions.
Feel free to share this information with whomever you wish.
I certainly would be willing to discuss this matters more completely in any venue at all. Just set the time and place and I will be happy to attend.
![]()
(I
am a proponent of the view that exposure is the best antiseptic).
Yours,
Caleb Burns, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist

Dan
R.Hyatt
is a member of the Oregon Bar.
He
must be a member of the bar to be eligible to be an administrative law judge.
He currently is employed by the Social Security Administration as an
administrative law judge out of the Portland Oregon ODAR.
The following are complaints to the Oregon State Bar
or other privileged documents:
Administrative Law Judge Dan R. Hyatt calls
claimant "White Trash" tells black and white couple that he has "a problem
with interracial marriage." Eventually another judge hears the case
and they are granted Social Security Disability
click here
Request for investigation
as to why ALJ Dan Hyatt insists on holding hearings in inconvenient location
in State of Washington after report that he was doing it for his own "tax
reasons." click here
Social Security agrees to fine itself $1,500 because of the
vexatious, wanton and oppressive conduct of Dan Hyatt.
Dan Hyatt has an "anti-claimant" standard if an attorney is an effective
attorney as Dan Hyatt demands only "docile counsel", Dan Hyatt calls Social
Security lawyer an "asshole." click here
Complaint about Dan R. Hyatt's alleged criminal coercion against editor of Oregon State Bar Reporter to get him to take down this webpage and all over public documents of Dan R. Hyatt click here
Complaint to Oregon State Bar~ Re: Probable cause to investigate Administrative Law Judge Dan Hyatt’s
(Oregon Bar Member: 782524) possible involvement in transport of
stolen federal property across state lines and breach and broadcast of citizen’s
Social Security number and other confidential and private information
click here
Chief
Administrative Law Judge of the United States, scolds Oregon State Bar for
receiving and hanging onto stolen social security number from ALJ Dan Hyatt
Private Social Security number revealed by ALJ Dan Hyatt to the public
"property of Social Security" and its ended up at Oregon Bar violates the
law
click letter to make larger
Complaint to Oregon State Bar-damage to thousands if
Dan Hyatt is acting recklessly and has the secrets of thousands of helpless
people in Oregon and Washington State.
click here
Social Security number of attorney goes missing in office
where Dan Hyatt works click here
Demand that Administrative Law Judge Dan Hyatt be suspended
pending results of investigation of theft of government property and
compromising of private social security numbers
click here
Demand that Oregon State Bar surrender stolen property to
victim of Social Security employee who revealed his personal medical
information and social security number. Receiving/possession stolen
property is a crime click here
Administrative Law Judge Dan Hyatt cooks the evidence to
blackball consultative examiners who find that claimants are disabled; stops
claimant's lawyer from asking questions at hearings
click here
Hyatt blackballs some of the finest psychiatrists in two states because they
sometimes find claimants "disabled" click
here
Dan
Hyatt is misrepresenting that he is a United States District Court Judge
says complaint to Oregon State Bar click here
This has been going on since he first became a administrative law judge 11 years ago:
Dan Hyatt lies, Dan Hyatt is biased against certain claimants, takes out revenge against lawyer who aggressively represented Social Security clients, after waiting 3 years for a Social Security hearing, claimants face;
intimidation,
anger,
and other vituperative behavior (containing or characterized by verbal abuse)
refusal to hear evidence,
cancellation of hearings with no opportunity to develop a record on appeal,
ex parte (without their attorney present) contact with claimants, and
foreclosure of cross-examination.
according to
lawsuit against ALJ Dan Hyatt click here
Administrative Law Judge Dan Hyatt calls private
attorney for claimant a "moron" and a liar. Hyatt is proven to be
wrong on all counts. Threatens to have disabled veteran of Vietnam War
"thrown out" of hearing because he was moving too slowly after
hearing cancelled by ALJ Dan Hyatt click here
Dan Hyatt treats disabled United States Navy veteran
shamefully. Threatens to have 300 pound (plus) guard "throw out"
disabled veteran. click here
Dan Hyatt ignores the law and lies in an order.
click here
Dan Hyatt misrepresents and commits fraud by implying he is
a United States District Court Judge, nominated by the President and
confirmed by the US Senate when he is not;
Dan Hyatt admonished by Social Security Administration for
acting "unprofessionally",
Dan Hyatt is a "poor historian", said another way, Dan Hyatt is a liar,
Dan Hyatt attempts to overburden attorneys who practice in
his Social Security room so that claimants will either decide not to hire an
attorney (and lose) or so he can act as an admin judge in front of only
docile and ineffective lawyers click here
Attorney David Lowry quoted by US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal (one level below US Supreme Court) saying that Dan Hyatt is a bald faced liar click here
Dan Hyatt "a bald faced liar" since 1998 to 2008! Ten Years a Liar, complaint to Oregon State Bar, "Unfitness of Dan R. Hyatt (Bar Number 782524)to be a member of the Oregon Bar Multiple violations of Rule 8.4 (3) dishonest, fraudulent, deceitful conduct, etc. click here
Dan Hyatt betrays his oath to support the laws of the United States as he creates his own laws and becomes judge/jury/executioner
Dan Hyatt lies, tells such a big lie, such an obvious lie, that it will take your breath away
Dan Hyatt demands that Shaking Social Security claimant
breach confidential attorney-client communication
click here
Dan Hyatt stops hearing of claimant who has been waiting for 8 years for disability benefits because claimant's attorney 'objected' to Dan Hyatt misstating the testimony and asking a leading question. click here
Because of Dan Hyatt's lies and cruelty, a social security claimant is forced to beg for food click here
Because of Dan Hyatt's betrayal of a claimant's social security number, steps are taken to protect his him identity theft so that his future social security benefits are not denied him when an illegal alien uses his stolen social security number click here
Dan Hyatt lies repeatedly to investigator as the Oregon State Bar investigates his alleged unethical conduct click here
Model Motion so that you can disqualify Dan Hyatt from hearing your case click here
Judge Dan Hyatt admits extra judicial bias-if you don't have a lawyer, he will rule against you click here
Dan Hyatt admits that he will rule against a Social Security claimant if his lawyer is "an asshole" click here